The Living Science Project

Living Science: what ideas does that conjure up in your mind? What makes science “living?” For many people, it means doing science rather than reading about it. For others, it means learning interesting things about space, and animals, and volcanos, and other things you may not have much up-close and personal experience with. For still others, it’s about playing with technology: building robots and computers.

I think some of us of a certain age might remember when we were turned off by science. It was everybody’s favorite subject until high school; we couldn’t get enough of it! Those who really loved science even did it at home, with projects and books. I think of Oliver Sacks, in his “chemical boyhood,” taking chunks of elemental sodium and dropping them into the river from a bridge to watch them explode. Then, by high school, science became a chore. It became lists of phyla, chemical nomenclature and obscure vocabulary to memorize. It became incomprehensible math, divorced from reality as you experience it. It was the chemistry lab that didn’t “work” with no chance to redo it. It was an abrupt and painful transition from the glorious study of nature in elementary school, and from learning how a refrigerator works in middle school, to a sheet of math problems in high school.

Note the stack of flash cards. This was for memorizing the kingdom/phyla/class/order/family/genus/species of quite a number of plants and animals. Fun, huh?

Note the stack of flash cards. This was for memorizing the kingdom/phyla/class/order/family/genus/species of quite a number of plants and animals. Fun, huh?

I started my daughter in Year 7 with a text that was to take us two years, covering all four areas of study for science: chemistry, physics, biology and earth science. I thought to add one non-text book in for each subject: Secrets of the Universe covered physics, The Elements by Theodore Gray for chemistry, Life of the Spider by Fabre for biology, and Earth Story by Lamb and Sington for earth science, adding in Eric Sloane’s Weather Book later in the process. What my daughter and I discovered is that she learned far better from the supplements than from the text. She asked questions, she remembered details, she made connections. And when we came to earth science, we found the text to be fairly deficient, covering material she already knew, and horribly boring. So we dropped it.

When we finished, it was time for us, like all good Americans, to split out individual science subjects. So, learning something from her middle school experience, we collected more “supplements,” and used a text and a lab manual, and created a chemistry course. While biology typically comes first, I felt that chemistry was foundational to biology, not the other way around. If she wanted advanced chemistry, she could take an advanced course later. And the math was no more difficult than her pre-algebra work.

Again, the text became boring, difficult, and full of minutiae to memorize. We weren’t getting anywhere, except with the supplements, and her labs were fine.

What if, I thought, I just tossed the text? What if you could make a high school level course without it?

EricSloane

I knew this book would be good. It has a sailboat on it.

 

It’s been done, well and in great detail here and here. What has interested me is the possibility of doing it the way Charlotte Mason might have done it, and how it has been done in countries that integrate science until the 11th grade. I believe there’s a lot of development going on in teen brains in the early years of high school, and concepts not understood as a 14 year old may be easier to grasp at 16. What differentiates Mason’s approach from what is typically followed is that it is developmental, it is integrated, it balances field and lab work with living literature, it eschews detailed processes for big ideas, and it strikes a balance between giving youth enough technical know-how to light a fire or even build a project, without turning them into mere technicians. It grounds inquiry in a firm foundation of prior knowledge.

Our bathroom lab with some equipment. Rubber duckies optional.

Our bathroom lab with some equipment. Rubber duckies optional.

Rather than lay out a curriculum, I hope to lay out our process and to review some of the resources available. I hope to share some of the science learning we’ve done so far, and some of the obstacles we find in our way.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “The Living Science Project

  1. This was refreshing as I spent the last hour reading about Common Core State Standards and thinking “what’s the big deal?” This is common sense. I believe just about everything integrates well with everything else. I might have rather been a liberal arts gal instead of a science major… And yes, what can be found to “supplement” often is more “exciting” than the traditional text, no doubt. I hope your children appreciate the education that you are providing for them.

    Like

  2. I’m so excited to learn more about what you’ve done with your daughter. I know that CM science is the way I want to go with Jemimah, and I certainly plan on piggybacking on your experiences as I do so. Thanks for being so willing to share your knowledge. I for one appreciate it.

    Like

  3. I am really looking forward to seeing how you do this. I have 5 boys- my oldest is in the 10th grade, and the next one is in the 8th grade. I have been reading CM’s volumes, and especially studying her schedules (which Really pointed to the integrated approach). Also reading a lot on AO, both the curriculum (which i have been following since the beginning…some years closer than others) and recently the Forum. I would really like for my upcoming freshman to be a guinea pig for this…trying to do it integrated through all of high school. (My older son has used Apologia, but i am pushing him to begin branching out and enjoying the living books out there.)
    I recently asked for living science books for physical science, and Lani mentioned some books you have used. My struggle now is to figure out which books to schedule which years, and to have an overall plan and scheduling…for example, Mondays as Botany, Tuesdays as Astronomy, etc…
    Again, looking forward to following your journey! Press on!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s